THE ZONE OF INTEREST is a film, I think, that demonstrates quite clearly the banality of evil. This phrase, coined by Hannah Arendt, refers to the fact that evil people are often quite ordinary, even boring. We saw this with the characters in the film. And I think that's what gave THE ZONE OF INTEREST its power.
We meet the Höss family: a husband, his wife, their kids. They have a nice house. The parents, as do most, read to their children before bed. They seem to have friends. But Höss--that is, Rudolph Höss--is the director at Auschwitz. The family lives next to the camp. And you can hear the screams of the people being burned alive as the Hoss family goes about their activities. They pretend not to notice. But they do. The presence of the camp and its infernal noises--its whirring machines, the screams of pain--drive Höss’s mother-in-law from the home. She'd come by for a visit.Â
The evil in the film is modern and bureaucratic. The Nazi regime was German, after all, and Germany is, of course, a sort of progenitor of many of our systemic, bureaucratic things. The people involved in these crimes have meetings and discuss promotions. It's like we're witness, at times, to a corporate board executive session.Â
But evil is evil, and when you invite evil into your life, it will spread like a virus. There is a telling scene where Hoss is taking his children on a fishing trip, and the detritus from the death camp--the detritus being ashed human bodies--begins poisoning the river, like sin entering Eden. Höss finds a piece of a skeleton. He immediately takes his kids home and demands they be washed. And he frantically washes himself, as if he's trying to cleanse himself of the terrible things he has done.Â
Because that's the other lesson of the film--that even though human beings are capable of great evil and terror, we weren't made for that purpose. And so the body rejects evil, as if it's a pathogen. Which is why Höss, later in the film, is shown wondering why he has so many digestive problems. And we see him walking down the stairs, heading home from "work," and then he stops, retching. His body can't physically handle the terror he's caused.Â
The film stays with the Höss family, and I think that was the right choice. In this instance, we don't need the Allies coming in as liberators. We need to see evil as it is. We need to watch it and not turn away. The choices Jonathan Glazer, the director made, help us do this. And we don't want to sentimentalize the story. Sentimentality is another kind of turning away.Â
We need to see what this family did. We need to see what the Nazi regime did. We need to confront it. Because this is an evil that never goes away.
I watched it because it was nominated for a Best Film Oscar and we had to vote, otherwise I probably would not have had the opportunity.
It is powerful, in many ways more horrifying than films that graphically show the atrocities, while also allowing someone like me (empaths who have a physical reaction to watching horrors), to learn more about how the whole period played out.
For example, I could not get through even 30 minutes of Flower Moon because I know it will be too hard to watch. If you've seen Flower Moon would you mind giving a similar detailed review so I can get a better sense of what happens?
I am also shocked that Origin was completely shut out of the Oscar Nominations. It would have been my first choice for Best Film. It also depicts the atrocities but in a way that allows an understanding while not being gratuitous (for lack of a better word, I'm sorry).
I know I should be strong and watch, out of respect for those who actually endured the horrors. But the physical response makes it almost impossible.
Thank you.
This review piques my interest in a movie that, otherwise, I probably wouldn't have heard of.
Since 2021, I've sometimes wondered about the, uh, banality of the private lives of medical and pharmaceutical professionals (i.e., of the otherwise intelligent, competent, and caring people who are compensated, rewarded, and--sometimes--celebrated for injecting as many humans as possible with DNA-altering and stroke- and heart disease-inducing bioweapons).
Separate, but related:
Also: Since 2021, I've considered The United States of America--due to its subservience to Klaus Schwab's agenda--to be, "The United States of The Fourth Reich.") Beginning in 2022, the NATO-Russia War confirmed that bitter perspective.